Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-ph5wq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T19:07:43.811Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Attitudinal Differences Between Heterosexually and Homosexually Oriented Males

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2018

D. C. Kendrick
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Hull
R. V. G. Clarke
Affiliation:
Kingswood Training and Classifying Schools, Kingswood, Bristol

Extract

Bene (1965) in a previous issue of this Journal, has summarized the main evidence for the view that homosexuality is a product of defective role training and is not a result of any direct genetic mechanism. It is becoming apparent that once a child has been pronounced as a boy or a girl it has to learn the forms of behaviour appropriate to its ascribed sex. The learning or conditioning mechanism by which the child learns to make its role performance congruent with its' ascribed sex is not understood. Comfort (1964) has suggested that sex-typing may be some form of imprinting. Hampson (1965) investigating several types of hermaphroditism has found evidence that if the gender role has to be changed after about the third year of life, increasing psychological difficulties are encountered. He also points out that the development of the gender role coincides with that of language.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1967 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bene, , Eva, (1965). “On the genesis of male homosexuality: an attempt to clarify the role of the parents.” Brit. J. Psychiat., 111, 808, 813.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clarke, R. V. G. (1965a). “An investigation by conceptual analytic methods of attitudes to homosexuality in normal and homosexual males.” Unpublished M.A. Thesis. University of London Library.Google Scholar
Clarke, R. V. G. (1965b). “The Slater Selective Vocabulary Scale and male homosexuality.” Brit. J. med. Psychol., 38, 339340.Google Scholar
Comfort, A. (1964). Sex in Society. London.Google Scholar
Eysenck, H. J., and Eysenck, Sybil B. G. (1965). Manual of the Eysenck Personality Inventory. London: University of London Press.Google Scholar
Ferenczi, S. (1914). Contributions to Psycho-analysis. New York: Brunner, 1950.Google Scholar
Festinger, L., and Bramel, D. (1962). “The reaction of humans to cognitive dissonance.” In: Experimental Foundations of Clinical Psychology, Ed., Bachrach, A. J. New York: Basic Books Inc.Google Scholar
Freud, S. (1911). “A case of paranoia.” In: Collected Papers, 3, 387470.Google Scholar
Hampson, J. L. (1965). “Determinants of psychosexual orientation.” In: Sex and Behaviour, Beach, F. A. (Ed.), New York, London, Sydney: John Wiley & Sons Inc.Google Scholar
H.M.S.O. (1960). Classification of Occupations, 1960. London: H.M.S.O.Google Scholar
Kelly, G. (1955). The Psychology of Personal Constructs. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Kinsey, , Pomeroy, and Martin, (1948). Sexual Behaviour in the Human Male. Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Osgood, C. E., Suci, G. J., and Tannenbaum, P. H. (1957). The Measurement of Meaning. Urbana, Ill.: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Raven, J. C. (1958). “Guide to using the Mill Hill Vocabulary Scale with the Progressive Matrices.” London: H. K. Lewis.Google Scholar
Sears, R. R. (1965). “Development of Gender Role.” In: Sex and Behaviour, Beach, F. A. (Ed.), New York, London, Sydney: John Wiley & Sons Inc.Google Scholar
Zimbardo, P. G. (1960). “Involvement and communication discrepancy as determinants of opinion conformity.” J. abn. soc. Psychol., 60, 8694.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.