Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-7qhmt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T14:12:11.240Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Changes in the Prognosis of Functional Psychoses Since the Days of Kraepelin

The Forty-first Maudsley Lecture, delivered before the Royal Medico-Psychological Association, 18th November, 1966

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2018

Örnulv Ödegård*
Affiliation:
Gaustad Psychiatric Hospital, Oslo, Norway

Extract

My choice of Kraepelin as a point of departure for this lecture has definite reasons. If one wants to stay within the field of clinical psychiatry (as opposed to psychiatric history), that is as far back as one can reasonably go. By this no slight is intended upon the pre-Kraepelinian psychiatrists. For our topic Henry Maudsley would indeed have been a most appropriate starting point, and by no means for reasons of courtesy. His general point of view is admirably sound as a basis for the scientific study of prognosis in psychiatry. I quote: “There is no accident in madness. Causality, not casualty, governs its appearance in the universe, and it is very far from being a good and sufficient practice simply to mark its phenomena and straightway to pass on as if they belonged not to an order but to a disorder of events that called for no explanation.” On the special problem of prognosis he shows his clinical acumen by stating that the outlook is poor when the course of illness is insidious, but this only means that these cases develop their psychoses on the basis of mental deviations which go very far back in the patient's life, so that in fact they are generally in a chronic stage at the time of their first admission to hospital. Here he actually corrects a mistake which is still quite often made. He shows his dynamic attitude when he says that prognosis is to a large extent modified by external conditions, in particular by the attitude of friends and relatives. Maudsley's dynamic reasoning was limited by the narrow framework of the degeneration hypothesis of those days. He had a sceptical attitude towards classification, which he regarded as artificial and dangerously pseudo-exact. His own classification was deliberately provisional, with very wide groups. He held that a description of various sub-forms of chronic insanity was useless, as it would mean nothing but a tiresome enumeration of unconnected details.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1967 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Astrup, Chr., and Kjell, Noreik (1966). Functional Psychoses: Diagnostic and Prognostic Models, Springfield, Ill.Google Scholar
Bleuler, E. (1913). “Dementia praecox oder die Gruppe der Schizophrenien.” (in Aschaffenburg: Handbuch der Psychiatrie). Leipzig.Google Scholar
Bleuler, E. (1926). “Zur Unterscheidung des Physiogenen und des Psychogenen bei der SchizophrenicFestschrift Kraepelin. Leipzig, pp. 2237.Google Scholar
Clouston, S. T. (1898). Clinical Lectures on Mental Diseases. 5th ed. London.Google Scholar
Evensen, , Hans, (1904). Dementia Praecox. Oslo.Google Scholar
Evensen, , Hans, (1936). “Recherches faites après la sortie sur environ 800 cas de démence précoce.” Sixth Congress of Scandinavian Psychiatrists, pp. 799816. Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Henderson, D. K., and Gillespie, R. D. (1944). A Textbook of Psychiatry. 6th ed. London.Google Scholar
Kraepelin, , Emil, (1896). Psychiatrie. Ein Lehrbuch für Studierende und Aerzte. 5te Auflage. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Kraepelin, , Emil, (1913). 8te Auflage. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Lange, Johs. (1936). Kurzgefasstes Lehrbuch der Psychiatrie. 2te Auflage. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Maudsley, , Henry, (1898). Physiology and Pathology of Mind. 2nd edition.Google Scholar
Meyer, , Adolf, (1951). Collected Papers. Vol. 2. Baltimore.Google Scholar
Wernicke, C. (1900). Grundriss der Psychiatrie. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Weygandt, Wilh. (ed.) (1935). Lehrbuch der Nerven- und Geisteskrankheiten. Halle.Google Scholar
Ödegård, Ö. (1964). “Pattern of discharge from Norwegian psychiatric hospitals.” Amer. J. Psychiat., 120, 772778.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.