Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-15T07:49:40.017Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Birth Order Studies: Some Sources of Bias

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2018

J. S. Price  and
E. H. Hare
J. S. Price
Affiliation:
M.R.C. Psychiatric Genetics Research Unit, Maudsley Hospital, London, S.E.5, and Bethlem Royal and Maudsley Hospitals
E. H. Hare
Affiliation:
Bethlem Royal and Maudsley Hospitals, Denmark Hill, London, S.E.5
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

“… they both felt, after the conclusion of their work, very doubtful as to the possibility of definitely proving the existence of a real differential incidence of any character in order of birth. The whole question seemed so open to fallacious possibility in different directions.”

[Report of comment by G. Udney Yule in the discussion following his joint paper with M. Greenwood at the Royal Statistical Society in 1914.]

Recently there has been an upsurge of interest in the association between behaviour, both normal and abnormal, and birth order. For instance, Barry (1967) has pointed out that in certain societies excessive parental demands are made on the first-born child, and “excessive parental demands could lead to superior achievement in a robust individual or to psychiatric illness in a child who was especially vulnerable …”; thus putting into modern language an interesting genotype-environment interaction which was summed up in the ancient Chinese proverb “fire burns wood but tempers iron”.

Type
Birth Order
Information
The British Journal of Psychiatry , Volume 115 , Issue 523 , June 1969 , pp. 633 - 646
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1969 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barker, D. J. P., and Record, R. G. (1967a). “The presence of disease and birth order: a comment on the Greenwood-Yule method.” J. Roy. Stat. Soc. C, 16, 13–16.Google Scholar
Barker, D. J. P., and Record, R. G. (1967b). “The relationship of the presence of disease to birth order and maternal age.” Am. J. hum. Genet., 19, 433–449.Google Scholar
Barry, H. (1967). “Birth order: achievement, schizophrenia and culture.” Int. J. Psychiat., 3, 439–444.Google Scholar
Berg, I., Fearnley, W., Paterson, M., Pollock, G., and Vallance, R. (1967). “Birth order and family size of approved schoolboys.” Brit. J. Psychiat., 113, 793–800.Google Scholar
Chen, E., and Cobb, S. (1960). “Family structure in relation to health and disease.” J. chron. Dis., 12, 544–567.Google Scholar
Cobb, J. A. (1914). “The alleged inferiority of the first-born.” Eugenics Review, 5, 357–359.Google Scholar
Dalen, P. (1965). “Family history, the EEG and perinatal factors in manic conditions.” Acta psychiat. Scand., 41, 527–563.Google Scholar
Dennehy, C. M. (1966). “Childhood bereavement and psychiatric illness.” Brit. J. Psychiat., 112, 1049–1069.Google Scholar
Granville-Grossman, K. L. (1966a). “Parental age and schizophrenia.” Ibid., 112, 899–905.Google Scholar
Granville-Grossman, K. L. (1966b). “Birth order and schizophrenia.” Ibid. 112, 1119–1126.Google Scholar
Greenwood, M., and Yule, G. U. (1914). “On the determination of size of family and of the distribution of characters in order of birth from samples taken through members of the sibships.” J. Roy. stat. Soc., 77, 179–199.Google Scholar
Gregory, I. (1958). “Analysis of familial data on psychiatric patients (etc.).” Brit. J. prev. soc. Med., 12, 42–59.Google Scholar
Grosz, H. J., and Miller, I. (1958). “Sibling patterns in schizophrenia.” Science, 128, 30.Google Scholar
Heron, D. (1907). “A first study of the statistics of insanity and the inheritance of the insane diathesis.” Eugenics Laboratory Memoirs, 2, 1–33.Google Scholar
Hill, O. W., and Price, J. S. (1967). “Childhood bereavement and adult depression.” Brit. J. Psychiat., 113, 743–751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohn, M. L., and Schooler, C. (in preparation). “An ongoing study of the social psychological consequences of occupation.” Google Scholar
Loxton, G. E. (1962). “Birth rank and maternal age.” Lancet, i, 271.Google Scholar
Newcombe, H. B. (1965). “Environmental versus genetic interpretations of birth-order effects.” Eugen. Quart., 12, 90–101.Google Scholar
Norton, A. (1952). “Incidence of neurosis related to maternal age and birth order.” Brit. J. prev. soc. Med., 6, 253–258.Google Scholar
Registrar General (1954). Statistical Review for England and Wales for the year 1950, Part 2. London: H.M.S.O. Google Scholar
Registrar General (1965). Statistical Review for England and Wales for the year 1962, Part 2. London: H.M.S.O. Google Scholar
Registrar General (1967). Statistical Review for England and Wales for the year 1965, Part 2. London: H.M.S.O. Google Scholar
Registrar General for Scotland (1945). Annual Report. Edinburgh: H.M.S.O. Google Scholar
Registrar General for Scotland ——(1968). Annual Report for the Year 1966. Edinburgh: H.M.S.O. Google Scholar
Schreider, E. (1967). “Physiological changes in successive pregnancies and birth-order effects.” Eugen. Quart., 14, 75–76.Google Scholar
Scottish Council for Research in Education (1949). The Trend of Scottish Intelligence. University of London Press.Google Scholar
Wahl, C. W. (1956). “Some antecedent factors in the family histories of 568 male schizophrenics of the United States Navy.” Am. J. Psychiat., 113, 201–210.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.