Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-dfsvx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T09:49:17.341Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Basic Psychoanalytic Concepts: II. The Treatment Alliance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2018

J. Sandler ,
A. Holder  and
C. Dare
J. Sandler
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, De Crespigny Park, London, S.E.5
A. Holder
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry
C. Dare
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Psychiatry and other medical disciplines have been paying increasing attention in recent years to the relationship between patient and doctor, and psychoanalytic concepts have been applied in order to formulate various aspects of this relationship. One of those most commonly applied is that of transference, which is now often loosely used as a synonym for relationship in general. The concept of transference will be discussed in detail in a further paper in this series, but a distinction has always been made within clinical psychonanalysis between transference ‘proper’ and another aspect of the patient's relation to the doctor which has been referred to in recent years as the ‘therapeutic alliance’, ‘working alliance’ or ‘treatment alliance’ (Zetzel, 1956; Loewald, 1960; Stone, 1961, 1967; Gitelson, 1962; Tarachow, 1963; Greenson, 1965, 1967; Friedman, 1969). The concept has been used in connection with the psychoanalytic treatment situation to describe aspects of what is familiar to all as the ‘therapeutic contract’ between the patient and his doctor (Menninger, 1958), and has been defined as ‘the non-neurotic, rational, reasonable rapport which the patient has with his analyst and which enables him to work purposefully in the analytic situation …’ (Greenson and Wexler, 1969). As far as the psychoanalytic situation is concerned, it has been maintained that the recognition of the difference between treatment alliance and other aspects of the patient-analyst interaction (such as transference) leads to an increased understanding of the processes which occur in that situation and, in particular, of those which enter into therapeutic failure. It is the purpose of this paper to examine the treatment alliance concept as it has developed within psychoanalysis and to consider its applicability outside the psychoanalytic treatment situation (Sandier, Dare and Holder, 1970).

Type
Research Article
Information
The British Journal of Psychiatry , Volume 116 , Issue 534 , May 1970 , pp. 555 - 558
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1970 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Erikson, E. (1950). Childhood and Society. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Fenichel, O. (1941). Problems of Psychoanalytic Technique. New York: The Psychoanalytic Quarterly Inc.Google Scholar
Freud, S. (1912). ‘The dynamics of transference’, in Standard Edition, 12, 97–108. London: Hogarth.Google Scholar
Freud, S. (1913). ‘On beginning the treatment’, in Standard Edition, 12, 121–44, London: Hogarth.Google Scholar
Freud, S. (1933). New Introductory Lectures on Psycho-Analysis. Standard Edition, 22, London: Hogarth.Google Scholar
Friedman, L. (1969). ‘The therapeutic alliance.’ Int. J. Psycho-Anal., 50, 139–53.Google Scholar
Gitelson, M. (1954). ‘Therapeutic problems in the analysis of the “normal” candidate.’ Int. J. Psycho-Anal., 35, 174–83.Google Scholar
Gitelson, M. (1962). ‘The curative factors in psychoanalysis.’ Int. J. Psycho-Anal., 43, 451–76.Google Scholar
Glover, E. (1945). ‘Examination of the Klein system of child psychology.’ Psychoanal. Study Child, 1, 75–118.Google Scholar
Greenson, R. R. (1965). ‘The working alliance and the transference neurosis.’ Psychoanal. Q., 34, 155–81.Google Scholar
Greenson, R. R. (1967). The Technique and Practice of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 1. New York: International Universities Press.Google Scholar
Greenson, R. R. and Wexler, M. (1969). ‘The non-transference relationship in the psychoanalytic situation.’ Int. J. Psycho-Anal., 50, 27–39.Google Scholar
Joffe, W. G. (1969). ‘A critical review of the status of the envy concept.’ Int. J. Psychol-Anal., 50, 533–545 Google Scholar
Loewald, H. (1960). ‘On the therapeutic action of psychoanalysis.’ Int. J. Psycho-Anal., 41, 16–33.Google Scholar
Meltzer, D. (1967). The Psycho-Analytical Process. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Menninger, K. (1958). Theory of Psychoanalytic Technique New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Sandler, J., Dare, C., and Holder, A. (1970). ‘Basic psychoanalytic concepts: 1. The extension of clinical concepts outside the psychoanalytic situation.’ Brit. J. Psychiat., 116, 551–4.Google Scholar
Sandler, J., Holder, A., Kawenoka, M., Kennedy, H. E., and Neurath, L. (1969). ‘Notes on some theoretical and clinical aspects of transference.’ Int. J. Psycho-Anal., 50, 633–45.Google Scholar
Segal, H. (1964). Introduction to the Work of Melanie Klein. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Sterba, R. (1934). “The fate of the ego in analytic therapy.” Int. J. Psycho-Anal., 15, 117–26.Google Scholar
Sterba, R. (1940). ‘The dynamics of the dissolution of the transference resistance.’ Psychoanal. Q., 9, 363–79.Google Scholar
Stone, L. (1961). The Psychoanalytic Situation. New York: International Universities Press.Google Scholar
Stone, L. (1967). ‘The psychoanalytic situation and transference: postscript to an earlier communication.’ J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assoc., 15, 3–58.Google Scholar
Tarachow, S. (1963). An Introduction to Psychotherapy. New York: International Universities Press.Google Scholar
Zetzel, E. (1956). ‘Current concepts of transference.’ Int. J. Psycho-Anal., 37, 369–76.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.