Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T22:30:17.061Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Change of Therapists as a Cause of Absences from Group Psychotherapy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2018

Anthony Dinnen*
Affiliation:
The Psychiatric Research Unit, Rozelle, N.S.W.; Current address: 66 High Street, Randwick, N.S.W. 2031

Extract

The involvement of a number of psychiatric hospital staff members in group psychotherapy meetings constitutes multiple therapy. In such a situation one staff member is customarily assigned the role of ‘therapist’ and the rest are called ‘observers'. Observers are often passive, but they may participate in the group proceedings as co-therapists (MacLennan, 1965; Bloom and Dobie, 1969). Multiple therapy is said to enhance treatment (Mullan and Sanguiliano, 1960; Rubins, 1967), but this may be a rationalization to excuse its continued practice (MacLennan, 1965), particularly as it is so useful for training staff in group psychotherapy (Gans, 1962).

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1971 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Belinkoff, J., Resnick, E. V., Stein, A., Alpert, H., Bookhalter, S., Bross, R., Golub, M., Wachtel, A., and Bralove, R. (1962). “The effect of a change of therapist on the group psychotherapy in an outpatient clinic.” International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 12, 456–66.Google Scholar
Bell, D. S. (1966). ‘Psychiatric aspects of cerebral vascular disease.’ Medical Journal of Australia, 2, 829–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bell, D. S. (1968). ‘Group therapy of epilepsy.’ Rehabilitation, No. 67, 3145.Google Scholar
Berne, E. (1966). Principles of Group Treatment. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bloom, V., and Dobie, S. I. (1969). ‘The effect of observers on the process of group therapy.’ International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 19, 7987.Google Scholar
Daniels, D. N., and Rubin, R. S. (1968). ‘The community meeting. An analytical study and a theoretical statement.’ Archives of General Psychiatry, 18, 6075.Google Scholar
Foulkes, S. H. (1964). Therapeutic Group Analysis. New York: International Universities Press, Inc.Google Scholar
Gans, R. (1962). ‘Group co-therapists in the therapeutic situation.’ International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 12, 82–8.Google Scholar
Gottlieb, A., and Kramer, M. (1965). ‘Alternate-therapist group meetings: An approach to the severely ambivalent patient.’ International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 15, 187–97.Google Scholar
Grosz, H. J., and Wright, C. S. (1967). ‘The tempo of verbal interaction in an open therapy group conducted in rotation by three different therapists.’ International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 17, 513–23.Google Scholar
Jarvis, P. E., and Esty, J. F. (1968). ‘The alternate-therapist-observer technique in group therapy training.’ International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 18, 95–9.Google Scholar
Maclennan, B. W. (1965). ‘Co-therapy.’ International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 15, 154–66.Google Scholar
Menninger, R. W. (1959). ‘Observations on absences of member patients in group psychotherapy.’ International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 9, 195203.Google Scholar
Mullan, H., and Sanguiliano, I. (1960). ‘Multiple psychotherapeutic practice; preliminary report.’ American Journal of Psychotherapy, 14, 550–65.Google Scholar
Rubins, J. L. (1967). ‘Multiple therapists.’ In Comprehensive Text Book of Psychiatry (eds. Freedman, A. H., and Kaplan, H. I.). Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins Go.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.