Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T23:46:40.797Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Diagnostic Significance of Overinclusive Thinking in an Unselected Psychiatric Population

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2018

R. W. Payne ,
D. V. Hawks ,
D. Friedlander  and
D. S. Hart
R. W. Payne
Affiliation:
Institute of Psychiatry Addiction Research Unit, 101 Denmark Hill, London
D. V. Hawks
Affiliation:
Department of Behavioral Science, Temple University Medical School, c/o Eastern Pennsylvania Psychiatric Institute, Henry Avenue, Philadelphia, Pa. 19129, U.S.A.
D. Friedlander
Affiliation:
Student Counselling Services, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
D. S. Hart
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Memorial University, St. John's, Newfoundland, Canada
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Cameron (1938, 1939) suggested that schizophrenic thought disorder is largely the result of overinclusive thinking, which he defined as the inability to preserve conceptual boundaries. Payne, Matussek and George (1959) developed a battery of objective measures of overinclusive thinking, which they found differentiated between an acute schizophrenic and a neurotic control group. Payne and Hewlett (1960) found that a battery of tests of overinclusive thinking intercorrelated as expected. They were able to obtain a factor score from their overinclusion test battery which differentiated a group of acute schizophrenic patients from control groups of depressives, neurotics and normal subjects. Payne and Friedlander (1962), on the basis of this factorial study, suggested a short battery of three measures of overinclusive thinking consisting of the number of ‘Non-A’ or unusual responses to the Object Classification Test (Payne, 1962), the average number of words used in explaining the Benjamin Proverbs given under special 'stress free’ instructions, and the average number of objects classified together in the ‘handing over’ section of the Goldstein-Scheerer Object Sorting Test. This standard test battery has been the operational definition of overinclusive thinking in a number of studies. Only one study of the reliability of this test battery appears to have been carried out. Hawks and Payne (1971) report the correlations obtained from a group of 54 psychiatric inpatients who were retested after a 4-day interval. The test-retest correlation coefficient (uncorrected) obtained from the Combined Transformed score (Payne and Friedlander, 1962) was 0 · 87. The reliabilities of the individual tests ranged from 0·77 to 0·86.

Type
Research Article
Information
The British Journal of Psychiatry , Volume 120 , Issue 555 , February 1972 , pp. 173 - 182
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1972 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Benjamin, J. D. (1944). ‘A method for distinguishing and evaluating formal thinking disorders in schizophrenia.’ In: Kasanin, J. S. (Ed.), Language and Thought in Schizophrenia. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 65–90.Google Scholar
Cameron, N. (1938). ‘Reasoning, regression and communication in schizophrenics.’ Psychological Monographs, 50, 1–33.Google Scholar
Cameron, N. (1939). ‘Deterioration and regression in schizophrenic thinking.’ Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 34, 265–70.Google Scholar
Claridge, G. S. (1967). Personality and Arousal: A Psychophysiological Study of Psychiatric Disorder. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Foulds, G. A., Hope, K., McPherson, F. M., and Mayo, P. R. (1967a). ‘Cognitive disorder among the schizophrenias: I. The validity of some tests of thought process disorder.’ British Journal of Psychiatry, 113, 1361–8.Google Scholar
Foulds, G. A., Hope, K., McPherson, F. M., Mayo, P. R. (1967b). ‘Cognitive disorder among the schizophrenias: II. Differences between the subcategories.’ British Journal of Psychiatry, 113, 1369–74.Google Scholar
Foulds, G. A., Hope, K., McPherson, F. M., Mayo, P. R. (1968). ‘Paranoid delusions, retardation and overinclusive thinking.’ Journal of Clinical Psychology, 24, 177–8.Google Scholar
Goldstein, R. H., and Salzman, L. F. (1965). ‘Proverb word counts as a measure of overinclusiveness in delusional schizophrenics.’ Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 70, 244–5.Google Scholar
Goldstein, K., and Scheerer, M. (1941). ‘Abstract and concrete behavior, an experimental study with special tests.’ Psychological Monographs, 53, No. 2.Google Scholar
Hawks, D. V. (1964). ‘The clinical usefulness of some tests of overinclusive thinking in psychiatric patients.’ British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 3, 186–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawks, D. V. and Payne, R. W. (1971). ‘Overinclusive thought disorder and symptomatology.’ British Journal of Psychiatry, 118, 663–70.Google Scholar
Hewlett, J. H. G. (1959). ‘An investigation into some aspects of thought disorder in abnormal groups.’ Unpublished Ph.D. thesis: University of London Library.Google Scholar
Hollincshead, A. B., and Redlich, F. C. (1958). Social Class and Mental Illness. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Lloyd, D. N. (1967). ‘Overinclusive thinking and delusions in schizophrenic patients: a critique.’ Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 72, 451–3.Google Scholar
Payne, R. W. (1958). ‘Diagnostic and personality testing in clinical psychology.’ American Journal of Psychiatry, 115, 25–9.Google Scholar
Payne, R. W. (1960). ‘Cognitive abnormalities.’ In: Eysenck, H. J. (Ed.), Handbook of Abnormal Psychology. London: Pitman, 193–261.Google Scholar
Payne, R. W. (1962). ‘An object classification test as a measure of overinclusive thinking in schizophrenic patients.’ British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 1, 213–21.Google Scholar
Payne, R. W. (1968). ‘The long-term prognostic implications of overinclusive thinking in mental patients: A follow-up study using objective tests.’ Proceedings of the IV World Congress of Psychiatry, Madrid, 1966. New York: Excerpta Medica Foundation, 2657–66.Google Scholar
Payne, R. W., Caird, W. K., and Laverty, S. G. (1964). ‘Overinclusive thinking and delusions in schizophrenic patients.’ Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 68, 562–6.Google Scholar
Payne, R. W., and Friedlander, D. (1962). ‘A short battery of simple tests for measuring overinclusive thinking.’ Journal of Mental Science, 108, 362–7.Google Scholar
Payne, R. W., Friedlander, , Laverty, S. G., and Haden, P. (1963). ‘Overinclusive thought disorder in chronic schizophrenics and its response to “Proketazine”.’ British Journal of Psychiatry, 109, 523–30.Google Scholar
Payne, R. W., and Hewlett, J. H. G. (1960). ‘Thought disorder in psychotic patients.’ In: Eysenck, H. J. (Ed.), Experiments in Personality. Vol. II: Psychodiagnostics and Psychodynamics. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 3–104.Google Scholar
Payne, R. W., Matussek, P., and George, E. I. (1959). ‘An experimental study of schizophrenic thought disorder.’ Journal of Mental Science, 105, 627–52.Google Scholar
Raven, J. C. (1948). Guide to using the Mill Hill Vocabulary Scale with the Progressive Matrices Scales. London: H. K. Lewis.Google Scholar
Watson, C. G. (1967). ‘Interrelationships of six overinclusion measures.’ Journal of Consulting Psychology, 31, 517–20.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.