Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T08:12:49.542Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Validity of Addict Notifications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2018

Joy Mott
Affiliation:
Home Office Research Unit, Romney House, Marsham Street, London SW1P 3DY
John Macmillan
Affiliation:
Teesside Polytechnic, Middlesbrough, Teesside TS1 3BA

Summary

Two representative samples of males first notified as addicts during 1969, one by hospitals and the other by penal establishments, were followed up for five years. It was found that 95 per cent of the hospital sample, but only 30 per cent of the penal sample, were addicted to opiates at some time during this follow-up, as judged by Home Office records. Notification may depend as much upon the setting and circumstances in which doctors see their patients as on their clinical judgement of a ‘notifiable’ case of addiction.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1979 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bishop, B. P., Cave, G. C., Gay, M. J. & Morgan, H. G. (1976) A city looks at its problem of drug abuse by injection. British Journal of Psychiatry, 129, 465–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blumberg, H. H., Cohen, S. D., Dronfield, B. E., Mordecai, E. A., Roberts, J. C. & Hawks, D. V. (1974) British opiate users: 1. People approaching London treatment centres. International Journal of the Addictions, 9, 123.Google ScholarPubMed
Blumberg, H. H. (1976) British opiate users: a follow-up study. British Journal of Addiction, 71, 6578.Google Scholar
Boyd, P. (1972) Adolescents—drug abuse and addiction. British Medical Journal; iv, 540–4.Google Scholar
Chapple, P. A. L., Somekh, D. E. & Taylor, M. E. (1972) Follow-up of cases of opiate addiction from the time of notification to the Home Office. British Medical Journal, ii, 680–3.Google Scholar
d'Orban, P. T. (1973) Female narcotic addicts: a follow-up study of criminal and addiction careers. British Medical Journal, iv, 345–7.Google Scholar
d'Orban, P. T. (1974) Court sentences in female narcotic addicts. British Journal of Addiction, 69, 167–72.Google ScholarPubMed
Ghodse, H. (1977) Casualty departments and the monitoring of drug dependence. British Medical Journal, i, 1381–2.Google Scholar
Mott, J. & Taylor, M. E. (1974) Delinquency amongst Opiate Users. Home Office Research Studies No. 23. London: H.M.S.O.Google Scholar
Mott, J. (1978) A long-term follow-up of opiate users and their criminal histories. In: Problems of Drug Abuse in Britain, ed. West, D. J. Cambridge: University of Cambridge Institute of Criminology.Google Scholar
Smart, R. & Ogbourne, A. (1974) Losses to the addiction notification system. British Journal of Addiction, 69, 225–30.Google Scholar
Spear, H. B. (1969) The growth of heroin addiction in the United Kingdom. British Journal of Addiction, 64, 225–30.Google Scholar
Stimson, G. V., Oppenheimer, E. & Thorley, A. (1977) Seven year follow-up of heroin addicts: current drug use and basic outcome. In press. Google Scholar
Thorley, A., Oppenheimer, E. & Stimson, G. V. (1977) Clinic attendance and opiate prescription status of heroin addicts over a six year period. British Journal of Psychiatry, 130, 565–9.Google Scholar
Watts, G. (1973) Drugs and the Act: five years of treatment centres. World Medicine, 26, 1527.Google Scholar
Woodside, M. (1973) The first 100 referrals to a Scottish addiction treatment Centre. British Journal of Addiction, 68, 231–2.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.