Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T17:19:31.990Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Marital Coital Rates and Dominance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2018

William H. James*
Affiliation:
MRC Mammalian Development Unit, Wolfson House, (University College London), 4 Stephenson Way, London NW1

Summary

Are heterosexual pairings in which the male is dominant more satisfactory? Coital rates of couples in which husbands were younger than their wives were contrasted with those in which husbands were older, but there was no significant difference. However, the data were not controlled for duration of marriage, and for a constant spouse-age-sum, couples with the husband the younger marry later on average than do the others. So whether younger-husband couples have lower coital rates is undecided.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1983 The Royal College of Psychiatrists 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abernethy, V. (1974) Dominance and sexual behavior. American Journal of Psychiatry, 131, 813–17.Google Scholar
Coleman, D. A. (1977) Assortative mating in Britain. In Equalities and Inequalities in Family Life, (eds. Chester, R. and Peel, J.). London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
James, W. H. (1974) Marital coital rates, spouses' ages, family size and social class. Journal of Sex Research, 10, 205–18.Google Scholar
James, W. H. (1981a) Variation between couples of human coital rates. Journal of Biosocial Science, 13, 151–6.Google Scholar
James, W. H. (1981b) The honeymoon effect on marital coitus. Journal of Sex Research, 17, 114–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, W. H. (In press) Assortative marriage, age of husband, and age of father. Journal of Biosocial Science, in press.Google Scholar
Roberts, D. F. (1977) Assortative mating in man. Bulletin of the Eugenics Society, Supplement 2.Google Scholar
Ryder, N. B. & Westoff, C. F. (1970) Reproduction in the US, 1965. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Siegel, S. (1956) Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. New York and London: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.