Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T08:38:56.427Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Test of the Social Support Hypothesis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

G. Parker  and
B. Barnett
G. Parker*
Affiliation:
University of New South Wales
B. Barnett
Affiliation:
Psychiatric Unit, Prince of Wales Hospital
*
∗Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick 2031, Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

As a test of the social support hypothesis, highly anxious primiparous mothers were assigned in the post-natal stage to either a professional intervention, a lay intervention or to a control group. It was hypothesised that those receiving an active intervention (be it lay or professional assistance) would become less anxious as a consequence of a central therapeutic ingredient – social support. Improvement was assessed by measuring state anxiety levels at baseline and at 12 months, while the degree to which therapists were incorporated into the social network was assessed by the Interview Schedule for Social Interaction (ISSI), given at baseline and at 12 months. While we established that anxiety levels were significantly lowered in those receiving the professional intervention and moderately (but not significantly) lowered in those receiving the lay intervention, ISSI scores for the separate groups appeared stable over the study. Reasons are considered why ISSI scores remained unchanged while intervention groups showed a reduction in anxiety levels.

Type
Research Article
Information
The British Journal of Psychiatry , Volume 150 , Issue 1 , January 1987 , pp. 72 - 77
Copyright
Copyright © 1987 The Royal College of Psychiatrists 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barnett, B. & Parker, G. (1985) Professional and nonprofessional intervention for highly anxious primiparous mothers. British Journal of Psychiatry, 146, 287–293.Google Scholar
Barnett, B., Parker, G. (1986) Possible determinants, correlates and consequences of high levels of anxiety in primiparous mothers. Psychological Medicine, 16, 177–185.Google Scholar
Brown, G. W. & Harris, T. (1978) Social Origins of Depression. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
Brugha, T., Conroy, R., Walsh, N., Delaney, W., O'Hanlon, J., Dondero, E., Daly, L., Hickey, N. & Bourke, G. (1982) Social networks, attachments and support in minor affective disorders: a replication. British Journal of Psychiatry, 141, 249–255.Google Scholar
Costello, C. G. (1982) Social factors associated with depression: a retrospective community study. Psychological Medicine, 12, 329–339.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hall, W. & Bird, K. (1985) The problem of multiple inference in psychiatric research. Australian A New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 19, 265–274.Google Scholar
Harris, T. & Brown, G. W. (1985) Interpreting data in aetiological studies of affective disorder: some pitfalls and ambiguities. British Journal of Psychiatry, 147, 5–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Henderson, S., Byrne, D. G. & Duncan-Jones, P. (1981) Neurosis and the Social Environment. Sydney: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hewson, D. & Bird, K. (1977) Psy Packaged Program. Typescript obtainable from the School of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Sydney.Google Scholar
Platt, S. (1980) On establishing the validity of “objective” data: Can we rely on cross-interview agreement? Psychological Medicine, 10, 573–581.Google Scholar
Spielberger, C. D., Gorsuch, R. L. & Lushene, R. E. (1970) Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (Self-Evaluation Questionnaire). Palo Aito, California: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.