Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-42gr6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T16:07:38.679Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Impaired Ability of Schizophrenics, Relative to Manics or Depressives, to Appreciate Social Knowledge about their Culture

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

J. Cutting  and
D. Murphy
J. Cutting*
Affiliation:
Bethlem Royal Hospital, Monks Orchard Road, Beckenham, Kent
D. Murphy
Affiliation:
Bethlem Royal Hospital
*
∗Correspondence
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Twenty schizophrenics, 20 manics, and 20 depressives were given two sets of multiple choice questions, one testing the subject's social knowledge of how people tend to act in a social situation and the other tapping their knowledge of events or objects which are relatively free of a social component. Schizophrenics were significantly impaired on the former set of questions relative to manics, and were significantly worse on both than depressives. It is suggested that these results represent an objective measure of the social naïvete of schizophrenics. The significant difference from manics indicates that the results are not merely the general effects of psychosis, particularly because the manics performed worse on an attentional test than the schizophrenics.

Type
Papers
Information
The British Journal of Psychiatry , Volume 157 , Issue 3 , September 1990 , pp. 355 - 358
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1990 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cameron, N. (1944) Experimental analysis of schizophrenic thinking. In Language and Thought in Schizophrenia (ed. J. S. Kasanin), pp. 50–64. Boston: Houghton Mifflin & Co.Google Scholar
Ciompi, L. (1983) Schizophrenic deterioration. British Journal of Psychiatry, 143, 79–80.Google ScholarPubMed
Cutting, J. & Murphy, D. (1988) Schizophrenic thought disorder. British Journal of Psychiatry, 152, 310–319.Google Scholar
Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E. & McHugh, P. R. (1975) Mini-mental scale. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12, 189–198.Google Scholar
Minkowski, E. (1927) The essential disorder underlying schizophrenia and schizophrenic thought (trans. 1987). In The Clinical Roots of the Schizophrenia Concept (1987) (eds J. Cutting & M. Shepherd), pp. 188–212. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nelson, H. E. & O'Connell, A. (1978) Dementia: the estimation of premorbid intelligence levels using the new adult reading text. Cortex, 14, 234–244.Google Scholar
Salzinger, K., Portnoy, S., Pisoni, D. B., et al (1970) The immediacy hypothesis and response-produced stimuli in schizophrenic speech. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 76, 258–264.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shakow, D. (1950) Some psychological features of schizophrenia. In Feelings and Emotions (ed. M. L. Reymert), pp. 383–390. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Shallice, T. & Evans, M. E. (1978) The involvement of the frontal lobes in cognitive estimation. Cortex, 14, 294–303.Google Scholar
Spitzer, R. L., Endicott, J. & Robins, E. (1975) Research Diagnostic Criteria. New York: New York State Psychiatric Institute.Google ScholarPubMed
Tsuang, M. T. & Winokur, G. (1974) Criteria for subtyping schizophrenia. Archives of General Psychiatry, 31, 43–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wing, J. K. & Brown, D. W. (1970) Institutionalism and Schizophrenia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.