Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T05:39:07.470Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Survey of Practice at a Regional Forensic Service: What Do Forensic Psychiatrists Do?

Part II: Treatment, Court Reports and Outcome

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Eric F. Mendelson
Eric F. Mendelson*
Affiliation:
Knowle Hospital, Fareham, Hampshire PO17 5NA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Nearly half of those seen in a forensic service were offered some form of help, but it did not reliably match that requested. In 63% of court reports there was no specific treatment recommendation, but where there was, it was likely to be accepted. Only one-third of all outpatients completed the treatment offered – 40% of the lapses were due to imprisonment. One-third of out-patient treatments were conducted under conditions of probation orders, and this form of compulsion was associated with a significantly higher number of completed treatment plans. Personality disorder was also associated with more treatment completions. These and other findings are discussed to assist in an understanding of the service.

Type
Papers
Information
The British Journal of Psychiatry , Volume 160 , Issue 6 , June 1992 , pp. 773 - 776
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal College of Psychiatrists 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bluglass, R. (1975) Forensic psychiatry services in the community. Journal of the Irish Medical Association, 68, 453–459.Google Scholar
Bond, M. (1989) Referrals to a new regional secure unit – what happens to patients refused admission? Medicine, Science and the Law, 29, 329–332.Google Scholar
Bowden, P. (1978a) Men remanded into custody for medical reports: the selection for treatment. British Journal of Psychiatry, 132, 320–331.Google Scholar
Bowden, P. (1978b) A psychiatric clinic in a probation office. British Journal of Psychiatry, 133, 448–451.Google Scholar
Bowden, P. (1978c) Men remanded into custody for medical reports: the outcome of the treatment recommendation. British Journal of Psychiatry, 132, 332–338.Google Scholar
Bullard, H. & Bond, M. (1988) Secure units: why are they needed? Medicine, Science and the Law, 28, 312–318.Google Scholar
Butler Committee (1975) Report of the Committee on Mentally Abnormal Offenders. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Coid, J. W. (1988) Mentally abnormal prisoners on remand: I - rejected or accepted by the NHS? British Medical Journal, 296, 1779–1782.Google Scholar
Faulk, M. & Taylor, J. C. (1986) Psychiatric interim regional secure unit: seven years' experience. Medicine, Science and the Law, 26, 17–22.Google Scholar
Fryers, T. & Wooff, K. (1989) A decade of mental health care in an English urban community: patterns and trends in Salford, 1976–1987. In Health Services Planning and Research (ed. Wing, J. K.), pp. 31–52. London: Gaskell.Google Scholar
Gibbens, T. C. N., Soothill, K. L. & Pope, P. J. (1977) Medical Remands in the Criminal Court. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Higgins, J. (1981) Four years' experience at an interim secure unit. British Medical Journal, 282, 889–893.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Offen, L. & Taylor, P. (1985) Violence and resources: factors determining admission to an interim secure unit. Medicine, Science and the Law, 25, 165–170.Google Scholar
Sparks, R. F. (1966) The decision to remand for mental examination. British Journal of Criminology, 6, 6–26.Google Scholar
Wardrop, K. R. H. (1967) Disturbed delinquents and the work of the forensic psychiatric clinic. Howard Journal of Penology and Crime Prevention, 12, 93–102.Google Scholar
Woodside, M. (1971) Probation and psychiatric treatment in Edinburgh. British Journal of Psychiatry, 118, 561–570.Google Scholar
Woodside, M. (1976) Psychiatric referrals from Edinburgh courts. British Journal of Criminology, 16, 20–37.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.