Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T18:48:51.682Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Reports of the death of factor analysis are greatly exaggerated

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Chris Evans
Affiliation:
Section of Forensic Psychiatry
Bridget Dolan
Affiliation:
Section of Biostatistics, St George's Hospital Medical School, Jenner Wing, Cranmer Terrace, London SW17 ORE
Dette Lynch
Affiliation:
Section of Biostatistics, St George's Hospital Medical School, Jenner Wing, Cranmer Terrace, London SW17 ORE
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Columns
Copyright
Copyright © 1992 The Royal College of Psychiatrists 

References

McDonald, R. P. (1965) Difficulty factors and non-linear factor analysis. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 18, 1123.Google Scholar
McDonald, R. P. (1981) The dimensionality of tests and items. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 34, 100117.Google Scholar
McDonald, R. P. (1982) Linear versus nonlinear models in item response theory. Applied Psychological Measurement, 6, 379396.Google Scholar
McDonald, R. P. & Ahlawat, K. S. (1974) Difficulty factors in binary data. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 27, 8299.Google Scholar
Zwick, W. R. & Velicer, W. F. (1986) Comparison of five rules for determining the number of components to retain. Psychological Bulletin, 99, 432442.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.