Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-wq2xx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-20T03:35:26.654Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Nefazodone and Imipramine in Major Depression: A Placebo-Controlled Trial

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Karl Rickels*
Affiliation:
Private Practice Research Group, Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
Edward Schweizer
Affiliation:
Private Practice Research Group, Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
Cathryn Clary
Affiliation:
Private Practice Research Group, Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
Ira Fox
Affiliation:
Private Practice Research Group, Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
Charles Weise
Affiliation:
Private Practice Research Group, Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
*
University Science Center, 3600 Market Street, Suite 803, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA

Abstract

Nefazodone is a phenylpiperazine antidepressant with 5-HT2 antagonism and 5-HT reuptake inhibition. Two hundred and eighty-three out-patients with a diagnosis of DSM–III–R major depression of at least one-month duration (65% ill for over 6 months), and a mean score of 24 on the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD), were randomised to treatment with nefazodone, imipramine, or placebo. The double-blind treatment period was 8 weeks in duration. Nefazodone's antidepressant efficacy was comparable with imipramine's, with both drug treatments significantly better than placebo in a variety of outcome measures. For example, after 8 weeks of therapy, 78% of nefazodone and 83% of imipramine but only 55% of placebo patients (P < 0.01) were globally much or very much improved. Nefazodone was better tolerated than imipramine, with fewer drop-outs and a lower incidence of side-effects during treatment.

Type
Papers
Copyright
Copyright © 1994 The Royal College of Psychiatrists 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Derogatis, L. R., Lipman, R. S., Rickels, K., et al (1974) The Hopkins Symptom Checklist (HSCL): a self-report symptom inventory. Behavioral Science, 19, 115.Google Scholar
Eison, A. S., Eison, M. S., Torrents, J. R., et al (1990) Nefazodone: preclinical pharmacology of a new antidepressant. Psychopharmacology Bulletin, 26, 311315.Google ScholarPubMed
Guy, W. (1976) ECDEU Assessment Manual for Psychopharmacology (US Department of Health, Education and Welfare publication ADM 76–338). Rockville, MD: National Institute of Mental Health.Google Scholar
Hamilton, M. (1960) A rating scale for depression. Journal of Neurology and Neurosurgical Psychiatry, 23, 5662.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nappi, G., Sandrini, G., Granella, F., et al (1990) A new 5-HT2 antagonist (ritanserin) in the treatment of chronic headache with depression: a double-blind study vs. amitriptyline. Headache, 30, 439444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rickels, K., Hesbacher, P., Fisher, E., et al (1977) The private practice research group (PPRG): a working model from psychopharmacology for clinical research in family practice. Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 17, 541554.Google Scholar
Schwbizer, E., Rickels, K., Amsterdam, J., et al (1990) What constitutes an adequate antidepressant trial for fluoxetine? Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 51, 811.Google Scholar
Sharpley, A. L., Walsh, A. E. S. & Cowen, P. J. (1992) Nefazodone – a novel antidepressant – may increase REM sleep. Biological Psychiatry, 31, 10701073.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Strauss, W. H. & Kleiser, E. (1991) Psychotropic effects of ritanserin, a selective S2 antagonist: an open study. European Neuropsychopharmacology, 1, 101105.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.