Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-fqc5m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T00:20:13.368Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Comments on the UK700 case management trial

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

K. Gournay
Affiliation:
Department of Health Services Research, Institute of Psychiatry, De Crespigny Park, Denmark Hill, London SE5 8AF
G. Thornicroft
Affiliation:
Department of Health Services Research, Institute of Psychiatry, De Crespigny Park, Denmark Hill, London SE5 8AF
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Columns
Copyright
Copyright © 2000 The Royal College of Psychiatrists 

We read with interest the paper regarding the cost-effectiveness of intensive v. standard case management for severe psychotic illness (UK700 Group, 2000).

We feel very strongly that more comment should have been made on the topic of training (or lack of training) of the case managers involved. The findings of this large, well-designed trial are very similar to those of Muijen et al (Reference Muijen, Cooney and Strathdee1994), who found no difference in outcome between the use of community psychiatric nurses (CPNs) configured into case management teams v. CPNs working in a generic way. The main implication of this study was that merely reconfiguring services into different working arrangements provides no additional benefits to patients. However, it could be argued that benefits may accrue if training in research-based interventions is provided. Indeed, such training for CPNs and other health care professionals has been developed in the Thorn and similar programmes, which focus specifically on providing skills in assertive community treatment, family interventions, psychological interventions etc. One could argue that these groups of skills, which comprise what is loosely known as psychosocial interventions, are essential to effective case management.

In the UK700 study, we note that the case managers received a 2-day induction course in case management and an unspecified amount of instruction in outreach practice given by a team leader in the assertive community treatment service from Boulder, Colorado. It seems to us that such training input is insufficient to provide the skills necessary to deliver truly effective psychosocial care. (The Thorn programme comprises 36 days of direct training plus the equivalent of 50 days of further study and project work.) We are therefore not surprised that the case managers with smaller case-load sizes could not improve on the outcomes attained by those working with the more average size case-loads.

Surely studies of training per se are now needed, with random allocation of case managers to training in research-based interventions or to standard practice, and measurement of outcomes for both the trainees (in terms of skills acquisition and knowledge gain) and their patients (in terms of clinical outcomes).

We are at present spending enormous amounts of money on training throughout the National Health Service and yet the vast majority of this training remains completely unevaluated. Although randomised controlled trials of training interventions will be costly, the price of not knowing whether training makes a difference is much greater.

References

Muijen, M., Cooney, M., Strathdee, G., et al (1994) Community psychiatric nurse teams: intensive support versus generic care. British Journal of Psychiatry, 165, 211217 Google Scholar
UK700 Group (2000) Cost-effectiveness of intensive v. standard case management for severe psychotic illness. UK700 case management trial. British Journal of Psychiatry, 176, 537543.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.