Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-42gr6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-17T12:15:38.712Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Somatoform disorders: a topic for education

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

R. Cullivan*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, St Camillus Unit, St Vincent's Hospital, Donnybrook, Dublin 4, Ireland
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Columns
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 2001 

Bass et al (Reference Bass, Peveler and House2001) believe that somatoform disorders are ignored by psychiatrists and health service planners because of the nature of diagnostic practice, a current pre-occupation with only “serious mental illness”, limited experience of patients with medically unexplained symptoms in general hospital settings, and stigma. They do not mention whether they have found an increasing fear of litigation to be another contributing factor. Currently, it appears to play a part in delaying referral to psychological services while the patient is exhaustively investigated for any physical pathology. Any comment they might make regarding this practice would be of interest.

Certainly, as they mention, a lack of training of non-psychiatric practitioners in this area contributes greatly to non-referral within the general hospital setting. We would, however, dispute their comment that psychiatrists working in this area find that patients with somatoform disorders “comprise between one-third and one-half of all referrals to the liaison psychiatry service”. A review carried out several years ago of the nature of referrals to the consultation—liaison services of two general hospitals in Dublin City (Reference Cullivan, Durkin and KellyCullivanet al, 1997) suggests a much smaller number of such referrals. Over a 6-month period 491 patients were referred and patients with diagnoses falling into categories F40-F48 of ICD-10 (neurotic, stress-related and somatoform disorders) accounted for only 12% of referrals in one hospital and 15% in the other. As a significant number of the patients in these categories were suffering from adjustment disorders, the numbers diagnosed with somatoform disorders, formed an even smaller percentage of all referrals.

It is worth noting that these were the diagnostic categories provided by the psychiatrists who assessed these patients. The reason for the referrals given by the medical/surgical teams was “no organic cause for symptoms found” in just 1.7% of cases in one hospital and 10.2% in the other. Perhaps somatoform disorders are even more neglected than previously thought? Education of both psychiatric and non-psychiatric personnel regarding these disorders would appear to be in need of urgent review.

Footnotes

EDITED BY MATTHEW HOTOPF

References

Bass, C., Peveler, R. & House, A. (2001) Somatoform disorders: severe psychiatric illnesses neglected by psychiatrists. British Journal of Psychiatry, 179, 1114.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cullivan, R., Durkin, I. & Kelly, G. (1997) Consultation–liaison psychiatry – a comparison of two services. Irish Journal of Medical Science, 166, 2324.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.