Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-r7xzm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T10:36:47.513Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Authors' reply

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

A. A. Dahl
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Aker University Hospital, N-0320 Oslo, Norway
A. Mykletun
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Aker University Hospital, N-0320 Oslo, Norway
E. Stordal
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Aker University Hospital, N-0320 Oslo, Norway
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Columns
Copyright
Copyright © 2002 The Royal College of Psychiatrists 

Friedman et al raise doubts as to the two-factor structure of the HAD scale reported by us. The size of our sample (n=51 930) allowed us to test our finding in several sub-samples. Using principal-components analysis, the same two-factor solution was also found in all sub-samples reporting somatic and psychiatric problems, as well as in all age— and gender-groups from 20 to 89 years. This indicates that the two-factor structure of the HAD scale is robust and stable. Therefore, eventual minor biases due to response rates cannot account for the discrepancy between Friedman et al's and our findings. Our third factor, which emerged only in sub-samples with low depression scores, always showed a low eigenvalue. Our results are in accordance with the conclusions of a recent literature review on the HAD scale (Bjelland et al, 2002) which concludes that a two-factor solution is most commonly found.

Friedman et al (2001) have a sample (n=2669) characterised by major depression (DSM-IV), which corresponds to high depression and probably variable anxiety scores on the HAD scale. When performing factor analysis, composition of the sample is essential for the results. If an inclusion criterion restricts the variance and covariance of the variables entered in the factor analysis, this will influence the factor solution found. The results by Friedman et al can be interpreted as a consequence of their restriction of their sample to major depression only, as this restricts the covariance between items on the HAD scale. In our sub-sample with various mental problems (n=2098) the two-factor solution is robust with high explained variance (82.1%).

Friedman et al's findings are of interest, however, since they answer the question: What is the factor structure of the HAD scale when anxiety appears in major depression? Comparing the fit coefficients between two— and three-factor solutions using confirmatory factor analysis must show the advantage of a three-factor solution. Friedman et al seem to presume that the factor structure of anxiety found in major depression is identical to that found for anxiety in the general population.

The advantage of population samples is that selection bias is minimised. In several of our studies based on the unselected HUNT-II population (from the Nord-Trøndelag Health Study) we have found results at variance with those of clinical samples (Engum et al, 2002; Wenzel et al, 2002). This could also explain the discrepancy between Friedman et al's and our results.

References

Bjelland, I., Dahl, A. A., Haug, T. T., et al (2002) The validity of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. An updated literature review. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 52, 6977.Google Scholar
Engum, A., Bjøro, T., Dahl, A. A., et al (2002) An association between depression, anxiety and thyroid function – a clinical fact or an artefact? Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, in press.Google Scholar
Friedman, S., Samuelian, J.-C., Lancrenon, S., et al (2001) Three-dimensional structure of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale in a large French primary care population suffering from major depression. Psychiatry Research, 104, 247257.Google Scholar
Wenzel, H. G., Haug, T. T., Mykletun, A., et al (2002) A population study of anxiety and depression among persons who report whiplash traumas. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, in press.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.