Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-mp689 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T11:25:52.841Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Author's reply

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

P. J. McKenna*
Affiliation:
Fulbourn Hospital, Cambridge CBI 5EF. E-mail: peter.mckenna@virgin.net
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Columns
Copyright
Copyright © 2004 The Royal College of Psychiatrists 

Actually, the study of Durham et al (Reference Durham, Guthrie and Morton2003) which was carried out under blind conditions failed to find a significant advantage for cognitive therapy over active placebo. The authors state that ‘Repeated measures analyses of variance were first conducted with three levels of treatment (CBT v. SPT v. TAU) and three time points (baseline, post-treatment, follow-up). There were significant effects for time for all variables except the GAS but no significant time × treatment interaction effects or contrasts for any of the measures’. This was for ‘Changes in severity from baseline’, with an essentially similar finding for ‘Clinically significant improvement’.

References

Durham, R. C., Guthrie, M., Morton, R. V., et al (2003) Tayside–Fife clinical trial of cognitive–behavioural therapy for medication-resistant psychotic symptoms. Results to 3-month follow-up. British Journal of Psychiatry, 182, 303311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.