Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T16:26:53.942Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Authors' reply

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

S. Hodgins
Affiliation:
Department of Forensic Mental Health Science, Institute of Psychiatry, De Crespigny Park, London SE5 8AF, UK. E-mail: s.hodgins@iop.kcl.ac.uk
R. Müller-Isberner
Affiliation:
Haina Forensic Psychiatric Hospital, Haina, Germany
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Columns
Copyright
Copyright © 2005 The Royal College of Psychiatrists 

Thank you for your interest in our work. It is important to note that we proposed that cognitive–behavioural interventions that have been shown to reduce offending could be adapted to treat a sub-group of offenders with schizophrenia. This sub-group shares with the offenders who have benefited from these interventions a history of antisocial behaviour since childhood, and antisocial attitudes and ways of thinking.

Dr Huda makes the presumption that interventions proven to reduce offending would not have a similar effect among offenders with schizophrenia. In our view, this presumption is unfounded. For example, treatments for medical conditions proven to be effective in people without schizophrenia are used with equal success with those with schizophrenia. We also disagree with Dr Huda's presumption because, generally, effective treatments target specific problems, not a disorder. This is true in the case of schizophrenia where different treatments have been shown to have a positive impact on positive and negative symptoms, substance misuse, life skills, social skills and employment skills (Reference Bloom, Mueser, Müller-Isberner and HodginsBloom et al, 2000).

As we noted, compliance with medication is a prerequisite to participating in interventions aimed at reducing offending. Furthermore, these interventions need to be adapted for use with people with schizophrenia and their effectiveness evaluated. This has been done recently, for example, with interventions that targeted substance misuse. Programmes that were adapted to patients with schizophrenia and integrated with their other treatments are reported to be effective (Reference Mueser, Noordsy, Drake and BarlowMueser et al, 2003).

We agree with Dr Huda that evidence for the effectiveness of cognitive–behavioural programmes in reducing offending among persons with schizophrenia is still sparse. It is presently limited to naturalistic follow-up studies with non-random assignment of participants (T. Fahy, personal communication, 2004; Reference Kunz, Yates and CzoborKunz et al, 2004). In our view, however, the available evidence is encouraging and sufficient to undertake randomised controlled trials of these interventions with the sub-group of offenders with schizophrenia who display a stable pattern of antisocial behaviour from an early age. Given the potential of these interventions to prevent criminal activity, improve the individual patient's life, and reduce costs to both the health and criminal justice system, such trials are urgently needed.

Footnotes

EDITED BY KHALIDA ISMAIL

References

Bloom, J. D., Mueser, K. T. & Müller-Isberner, R. (2000) Treatment implications of the antecedents of criminality and violence in schizophrenia and major affective disorder. In Violence among the Mentally Ill: Effective Treatments and Management Strategies (ed. Hodgins, S.), pp. 145169. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kunz, M., Yates, K. F., Czobor, P., et al (2004) Course of patients with histories of aggression and crime after discharge from a cognitive–behavioral program. Psychiatric Services, 55, 654659.Google Scholar
Mueser, K. T., Noordsy, D. L., Drake, R. F., et al (2003) Research on integrated dual-disorder treatment. In Integrated Treatment for Dual Disorders: A Guide to Effective Practice (ed. Barlow, D. H.), pp. 301321.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.