Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-wq2xx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T08:40:40.491Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bioterrorism: Psychological and Public Health Interventions Edited by Robert J. Ursano, Ann E. Norwood & Carol S. Fullerton. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2004. 376 pp. £70.00 (hb). ISBN 0521814723

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Anna Higgitt*
Affiliation:
St Charles Hospital, Exmoor Street, London W10 6DZ, UK, and Department of Health. The views represented here are personal and should not be taken as necessarily indicative of national policy
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Book Reviews
Copyright
Copyright © 2005 The Royal College of Psychiatrists 

This publication is a collaborative endeavour by international authors with expertise that can guide planned responses to terrorism, in particular bioterrorism. Ursano (Reference Ursano2002) has listed the goals of terrorism as: erosion of national security; disruption of the continuity of society; and destruction of social capital. The contributors to this book are keen to show that these invisible threats to our present-day society can, to some degree, be mastered - inchoate anxiety perhaps need not rule.

The book offers interesting, albeit depressing, historical perspectives on the impact of war and conflict on civilians. It discusses planning by the British government in the 1920s for coping with the dead and wounded should London be bombed in future conflicts. The role of US civil defence personnel - perhaps in training people not to panic - is described in detail in relation to America's fear of atomic bombs. This included well-publicised rehearsals of actions to take, even if they would ultimately have little effect on survival chances. Another chapter covers what might be learned from the public health impact of the 1918 influenza pandemic.

It is acknowledged that terrorism is a potent precipitant of psychiatric illness. For example, rates of post-traumatic stress disorder went up by 173% in lower Manhattan following the terrorist attack on the World Trade Center in 2001, and it was reported that 35% of Oklahoma residents had psychological problems following the attack there in 1996. Forty-three per cent of those attending hospitals following the Scud missile attacks on Israel were psychological casualties.

Much has been learned of the impact of disasters on public mental health. There is less specific knowledge in relation to bioterrorism, although responses are likely to be similar, whatever the cause of the disaster. The experts indicate that human responses are to a large extent predictable: many more people presented with symptoms they believed to be related to anthrax exposure following the World Trade Center attack than were infected, and some people are particularly vulnerable to such perceived threats. Those previously exposed to trauma may be at heightened risk. The authors are agreed that services should have plans for dealing with the mental health consequences of exposure (or threat of exposure) to biological agents just as they do for dealing with the physical consequences. Information should be provided by respected sources, communicated clearly. Rather than focusing on censorship, the provision of evidence-based guidelines for responsible reporting is recommended (a parallel with suicide reporting and prevention).

The need for bioterrorism to be included in local and national disaster planning efforts seems self-evident. This book provides some interesting and readable papers that should help guide those charged with developing such plans.

References

Ursano, R. J. (2002) Terrorism and Public Health (Presentation to the Institute of Medicine). Washington, DC: National Academies of Science.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.