Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-20T15:27:26.647Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Authors' reply

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

C. Haasen*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, University Medical Center Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany. Email: haasen@uke.uni-hamburg.de
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Columns
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 2007 

Drs Al-Adwani & Nahata raise an important issue when evaluating the outcome of maintenance treatment, namely how to evaluate the retention rate in an unmasked trial. The special incentive for patients randomised to methadone treatment was the option to switch to the heroin group after completing 1 year of treatment. Since retention is considered one of the main outcome measures for maintenance treatment, our trial shows that heroin-assisted treatment has two advantages: it reaches a higher number of potential patients (percentage initiating treatment) and the retention rate of those initiating treatment is significantly higher (68.3 v. 56.3%, log rank χ2=14.1, P<0.001). Therefore, it is incorrect to say that ‘retention rates would possibly differ insignificantly’: the difference is certainly less, but still significant.

References

EDITED BY KIRIAKOS XENITIDIS and COLIN CAMPBELL

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.