Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-fqc5m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-29T05:39:35.205Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Corrections

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Columns
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 2011 

Childhood eating disorders: British national surveillance study. . Page 295, summary, Method should read: Surveillance over 14 months through the established British Paediatric Surveillance Unit, and a novel child and adolescent psychiatry surveillance system set up for this purpose. Page 298, column 2, second paragraph under Incidence. The third sentence should read: Our data for 0- to 9-year-olds was two and a half times higher (0.75/100 000).

Regional brain activation/deactivation during word generation in schizophrenia: fMRI study. . The legend to Fig. 3 (p. 218) should read: Brain regions activated during semantic category word generation. Central area (A): core/essential brain regions activated during overt, semantic category word generation in healthy individuals. Outer ring (B): additional brain areas recruited exclusively by the schizophrenia group. The cognitive/associated processes underlying overt, semantic category word generation, mediated by the essential brain regions, are enlisted. L-, left; R-, right; R/L, bilateral; IFG, inferior frontal gyrus; ACC, anterior cingulate cortex; rPFC, rostral prefrontal cortex; MeFC, medial frontal cortex; MFG, middle frontal gyrus; INS, insula; CN, caudate nucleus; THAL, thalamus; CBL, cerebellum; STG, superior temporal gyrus; MTG, middle temporal gyrus; FG, fusiform gyrus; AG, angular gyrus; IPL, inferior parietal lobule; SN, substantia nigra; RN, red nucleus; SMA, supplementary motor area. The legend to Fig. 6 (p. 220) should read: Regression analysis: word repetition–word generation contrast images regressed with difference of word generation–word repetition latencies.

Timing of menarche and depressive symptoms in adolescent girls from a UK cohort. BJP, 198, 17–23. Figure 1 (p. 19) was printed incorrectly and should be as below:

Fig. 2 Confirmatory factor analysis model. Fac, factor; BMI, body mass index.

Figure 0

Fig. 2 Confirmatory factor analysis model. Fac, factor; BMI, body mass index.

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.