In the article ^{Reference Duffy, Horrocks, Doucette, Keown-Stoneman, McCloskey and Grof1} we presented data describing the clinical stages in developing bipolar disorder based on longitudinal repeated assessment of the offspring of well-characterised parents with bipolar disorder. The findings emphasise the importance of including family history and clinical course in the diagnostic formulation to improve early identification, given that early risk syndromes are non-specific and include anxiety and depressive syndromes. We also showed that offspring of lithium-responsive parents develop classic episodic mood disorders, whereas offspring of parents with a lithium non-responsive illness follow a trajectory that overlaps with psychotic disorders - both in early and end-stage disorders. We did not suggest that ‘a history of lithium use in relatives changes the trajectory’, rather we used an operationalised published protocol to identify a more homogeneous subtype of bipolar disorder based on the excellent response to long-term lithium in the affected parent. ^{Reference Grof, Duffy, Alda and Hajek2} Second, the staging model proposed by McGorry and colleagues ^{Reference McGorry, Nelson, Goldstone and Yung3} was originally based on clinical observations in help-seeking youth (clinically high risk) and only later validated by conversion rates to psychosis and more recently neurobiological findings. Our cohort is a genetically high-risk cohort and we are intensively investigating markers of illness predisposition and progression through the clinical staging model. ^{Reference Duffy, Horrocks, Doucette, Keown-Stoneman, Grof and Andreazza4} In regard specifically to neuroanatomical markers, in collaboration we have reported that enlarged right inferior frontal gyrus volumes may be a marker of bipolar disorder predisposition in high-risk offspring. ^{Reference Hajek, Cullis, Novak, Kopecek, Blagdon and Propper5}