Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-42gr6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T15:36:59.166Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Authors' reply

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Liz Forty
Affiliation:
Institute of Psychological Medicine and Clinical Neurosciences, Cardiff University, UK. Email: craddockn@cardiff.ac.uk
Nick Craddock
Affiliation:
Institute of Psychological Medicine and Clinical Neurosciences, Cardiff University, UK. Email: craddockn@cardiff.ac.uk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Columns
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 2015 

We agree with Schoepf & Heun about the importance of control-sample characteristics in case-control comparisons and the need to consider the possibility of biased or unrepresentative findings. That is why, in our study, we used age as a covariate to take account of the younger age of controls compared with our mood disorder cases. We also discussed the potential limitations on generalisability caused by using a voluntary sample from a single ethnic group.

Schoepf & Heun describe a different methodology (with its own strengths and limitations) to examine a different issue, namely the influence of comorbidity on mortality. It is encouraging that the findings from the two different approaches are consistent in highlighting the clinical importance of comorbidity of physical illness with bipolar disorder. Psychiatrists and mental health services must ensure that patients with bipolar disorder have access to appropriate, high-quality physical, as well as psychiatric, care.

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.