Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-24hb2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T01:37:09.078Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The medical profession and stigma against people who use drugs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Stephen K. Ginn
Affiliation:
Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust, London
Edward Clark
Affiliation:
London, UK. Email: stephen.ginn@candi.nhs.uk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Columns
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal College of Psychiatrists, 2017 

Corrigan et al Reference Corrigan, Schomerus and Smelson1 argue that stigma against people who use drugs is ‘in some ways socially, politically, and/or legally sanctioned’ and discuss this with reference to the criminal justice system, the workplace and health promotion strategies. How the medical profession, medical diagnosis, medical language and medical models of addiction might be propagating stigma is not discussed and we offer some examples.

First, terms widely used by the medical profession to describe people who use drugs are apparently neutral and objective, but in fact convey negative attributes. For instance, ‘drug abuse’ can be taken to imply that people who use drugs do so to deliberately inflict harm upon themselves. The use of this term also implies that there is a universally recognised standard for the ‘proper use’ of a given substance, when there is not.

Second, medical diagnosis is normative. The ICD-10 and DSM-5 define addiction by identifying normative standards of behaviour that people with drug dependency fail to achieve. For instance, one DSM criterion identifies drug use ‘resulting in failure to fulfil major role obligations at work, school, or home’. As Matthews et al Reference Matthews, Dwyer and Snoek2 put it: ‘to be diagnosed with addiction under these systems […] is to be classified as morally compromised or deficient’.

Third, medical models of understanding cast people who use and/or are dependent on drugs in a negative light. The cause of dependent drug use is contentious. Is it the result of moral choice, a disease, or normal brain changes that result from habit acquisition? The ‘moral model’ of drug use holds drug use as a choice, and has a critical stance against this choice, legitimising stigma. The ‘disease model’ sees dependent drug use as a result of neurobiology. This model underpins the medical approach to dependent drug use, where a diagnosis, based on symptoms and history, leads to prescribed treatment. Although this approach absolves responsibility, and therefore the potential for stigma via blame, it nevertheless influences stigma by casting dependent drug users as helpless victims. Reference Pickard3

Fourth, healthcare professionals are unsympathetic to people who use drugs. There is evidence that negative attitudes of healthcare professionals towards patients who use drugs are widespread. Reference Van Boekel, Brouwers, van Weeghel and Garretsen4 This may affect drug users' self-stigma. Gilchrist et al Reference Gilchrist, Moskalewicz, Slezakova, Okruhlica, Torrens and Vajd5 found that healthcare professionals appear to attach lower standing to working with people who use drugs than to work other patient groups. Since healthcare professionals are influential, these negative attitudes may engender stigma elsewhere.

Fifth, there is the matter of doctors and drug policy reform. As Corrigan et al point out, criminalisation fuels stigmatisation. Criminalisation is also responsible for many of the harms associated with drug use, for instance violence associated with the black market in drugs, and adulterated supply. Doctors are in a position to influence drug policy away from blanket criminalisation towards a more nuanced approach which more closely correlates to the potential for harm. Some organisations representing doctors have called for changes but ‘such calls are far from universal – and far from loud enough’. Reference Godlee and Hurley6

References

1 Corrigan, P, Schomerus, G, Smelson, D. Are some of the stigmas of addictions culturally sanctioned? Br J Psychiatry 2017; 210: 180–1.Google Scholar
2 Matthews, S, Dwyer, R, Snoek, A. Stigma and self-stigma in addiction. J Bioeth Inq 2017; 14: 275–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3 Pickard, H. Responsibility without blame for addiction. Neuroethics 2017; 10: 169–80.Google Scholar
4 Van Boekel, LC, Brouwers, EPM, van Weeghel, J, Garretsen, HFL. Stigma among health professionals towards patients with substance use disorders and its consequences for healthcare delivery: systematic review. Drug Alcohol Depend 2013; 131: 2335.Google Scholar
5 Gilchrist, G, Moskalewicz, J, Slezakova, S, Okruhlica, L, Torrens, M, Vajd, R, et al. Staff regard towards working with substance users: a European multi-centre study. Addiction 2011; 106: 1114–25.Google Scholar
6 Godlee, F, Hurley, R. The war on drugs has failed: doctors should lead calls for drug policy reform. BMJ 2016; 355: i6067.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.