Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-nwzlb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-27T01:52:08.267Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Border-Land Between Physiology and Psychology.—Singular Judgment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 February 2018

Extract

That there are two methods by which to approach the study of mind—the one inward and reflective, the other outward and transitive, including more especially the anatomy and physiology of the brain and nervous system—is by high authorities, even in physical and biological science, now generally admitted.

Type
Part I.—Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists 1880 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

The reader may find this question treated at some length by the author, in an article styled “The Veracity of Consciousness,” in “Mind,” January, 1877.Google Scholar

“Hamilton's Beid,” p. 389.Google Scholar

“Grammar of Assent,” p. 11, and p. 22.Google Scholar

“Elementary Lessons in Logic,” chapter vi., p. 47.Google Scholar

“Hamilton's Reid,” pp. 878, note, and 934.Google Scholar

Ibid, p. 327.Google Scholar

1 2 3 4, mutually differ; a a a a, mutually resemble. The former are in the sphere of the Singular, the latter, of the General.Google Scholar

“Prolegomena Logica,” p. 34.Google Scholar

Ibid, p. 35Google Scholar

“System of Logic,” Book iii, chap. 3.Google Scholar

The author's views on this question are given in “Mind,” July, 1878.Google Scholar

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.