Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-ph5wq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T08:48:21.527Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Treatment of Phthisis in Asylums by Urea and its Salts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 February 2018

J. Lougheed Baskin*
Affiliation:
Devon County Asylum

Extract

There has been a considerable amount of attention called to the subject of phthisis in asylums lately, and since the publication of the report of the Tuberculosis Committee the subject has appeared in a broader light. Although much is being and has been done for the prevention of phthisis by means of the Sanatorium movement, and the varieties of the technique of hygiene which are included in that treatment, yet there are still many aspects of the disease (both in the sane and insane) which require precise investigation, such as the variations in the composition of the secretions and excretions when the body is in the state of phthisical toxæmia; the relationship of the tuberculous toxæmia to other toxæmias, such as the influenzal (27), gouty, etc.; the accumulation of toxins, and its relations to recurrent forms of disease. The number of deaths from tubercle here during the past year we find to be ten; in 1900 it was nine, and 1899 it was fifteen, so that from a percentage of 1.3 in 1899 it has dropped to 0'85 in 1901. On examining the position of this asylum in the tables drawn up by the Tuberculosis Committee (1) we find it tenth in the asylums in England and Wales which are classified under Division i, which asylums have a tubercular death-rate of from 0.5 to 2.2, the county asylum at Exminster having a percentage of 1.3. This compares favourably with other asylums, some in the Division 2 having a tubercular death-rate of 5.1 and 8 per cent. respectively.

Type
Part I.—Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1903 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bibliography and References

1 Report of the Tuberculosis Committee, 1902.Google Scholar
2 Niemeyer, , Practice of Medicine, vol. 1.Google Scholar
3 ‘Practical Choice of Climate in Phthisis,’ Gordon, W. M.D., Lancet, June, 1901.Google Scholar
4 Messrs. Merck, Manufacturing Chemists, Dresden, Letter on ‘Synthesis of Urea.’ Google Scholar
5 Goulstonian Lectures, 1897, Arthur P. Luff, M.D. Google Scholar
6 Lancet, December 7th, 1901, June 15th, 1901, March 9th, 1901, Brit, Med. Journ., October, 1902, ‘Pure Urea in the Treatment of Tuberculosis,’ Dr. Henry Harper.Google Scholar
7 Letter on ‘Bacteriology of Phthisis and the Treatment of Tubercle Cultures with Urea,’ Dr. H. Harper.Google Scholar
8 Landois, and Stirling, , Physiology (last edition), vol. 1.Google Scholar
9 ‘Zomotherapy in Phthisis,’ Practitioner, July, 1901.Google Scholar
10 Duckworth, Dyce Sir, ‘Treatise on Gout,’ 1889.Google Scholar
11 Fagge's Practice of Medicine, articles on ‘Gout’ and ‘Phthisis.’ Google Scholar
12 Croonian Lectures, 1886, Latham, P. W. M.D., Lancet, April 3rd, 10th, 17th, 24th, May 1st.Google Scholar
13 Comptes Rendus, 1896, pages 185187.Google Scholar
14 Lumleian Lectures, 1883, Garrod, Alfred Sir.Google Scholar
15 Croonian Lectures, 1892, Roberts, William Sir.Google Scholar
16 Text-book of Physiological Chemistry, Halliburton.Google Scholar
17 Schäfer, E. A. Text-book of Physiology, article on ‘Urine,’ by Dr. Gowland Hopkins.Google Scholar
18 British Medical Journal, 1899, page 64, ‘Zoological Distribution of Tuberculosis.’ Google Scholar
19 Brit. Med. Journ., August 3rd, 1901, Dr. Buck at Congress on Tuberculosis.Google Scholar
20 Harben Lectures, 1901, ‘Bacteriolysis and Hæmolysis,’ by Professor Max Gruber, M.D. Google Scholar
21 System of Medicine, Allbutt, vol. 4.Google Scholar
22 Manual of Bacteriology, Muir and Ritchie, 2nd edition.Google Scholar
23 Essentials of Chemical Physiology, Halliburton, W. D. Google Scholar
24 The Practice of Medicine, Taylor, Frederick M.D. Google Scholar
25 Clouston, T. S. M.D., ‘Treatise on Mental Disease.’ Google Scholar
26 ‘Variations in the Phosphates and Urea of Urine,’ Clayton, E. G., F.C.S., Lancet, September 6th, 1902, page 656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27 Journal of Mental Science, April, 1901, page 231.Google Scholar
28 Insanity and Allied Neuroses, George H. Savage, M.D., article on ‘Phthisis and Insanity.’ Google Scholar
29 Dictionary of Psychological Medicine, Hack Tuke, D. M.D., article on ‘Insanity of Phthisis.’ Google Scholar
30 Bevan Lewis, W., Text-book on Mental Diseases.Google Scholar
31 Organic Chemistry, Emerson Reynolds, M.D., T.C.D. Google Scholar
32 Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Attfield, J. Google Scholar
33 Text-book of Chemistry, Remsen, I. Google Scholar
34 Materia Medica and Therapeutics, article on ‘Ammonia,’ J. Mitchell Bruce, M.D. Google Scholar
35 Materia Medica and Therapeutics, article on ‘Ammonia,’ Sir W. Whitla, M.D. Google Scholar
36 Introduction to Pathology and Morbid Anatomy, Greene, T. H. Google Scholar
37 Lancet, August 16th, 1902, page 420.Google Scholar
38 Lancet, September 20th, 1902, ‘The Causation and Prevention of Phthisis,’ Bramwell, Byrom Dr. Google Scholar
39 ‘Uric Acid as a Factor in the Causation of Disease,Haig, A. Google Scholar
40 Clinical Research Association.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.