∗ In compliance with general asage, Philosophy is used to refer to Metaphytics, although, strictly, it should include all the sciences. Google Scholar

∗ “Life of Sterling”—Archdeacon Hare. Google Scholar

∗ “Omphalos,” by P. H. Gosso, F.R.S., 1857. Google Scholar

See “Order of Nature,” by Itev. B. Powell, where some excellent observations are made on this subject. Google Scholar

∗ Dr. Wigan, on “The Duality of the Mind.” Google Scholar

∗ “Scriptura sacra est a prophetis ct apostolis ad docemlum non philosophiam (quam ad exercitionem rationis naturalis contemplationibus disputationibusque hominum reliquit Deus) sed pietatem et salutis eternæ viam.” Hobbe's “Leviathan,” c. viii. Google Scholar

† “History of England.” J. A. Froudc, M.A., 1856. Google Scholar

‡ “Corate's Philosophy of Science,” by G. H. Lewes, Bohn. Google Scholar

∗ “British and Foreign Review,” April, 1856. J. D. Morel. Google Scholar

∗ “Unity of Science,” p. 245. Google Scholar

† Spinoza in his Ethics says, “Quæ omnia satis ostendimi, unumquemque pro dispositionc cerebri de rebus judicasse, vel potius imaginationis affcctiunes pro rebus acccpisse. Quare non mirum est (ut hoc etiam obiter notemus) quod inter homines tot, quot experimur, controversiæ ortæ sunt, ex quibus tandem Scepticismus. Nam quamvis humana corpora in multis convcniunt in plurimis tamen discrepant, et ideo id quod uni bonum alteri malum vidctur; quod uni ordinatum, alteri confusum, quod uni gratum, alteri ingratum est.”—Quoted in Lewes' “Life of Goethe.” Google Scholar

∗ “Duality of the mind.”—Dr. Wigan, p. 16. Google Scholar

† “System of Logic.”—J.Stuart Mill, vol. ii., p. 529. Google Scholar

∗ “The Soul in Nature.”—Oersted. Google Scholar

† Morell's “Elements of Psychology.” Google Scholar

∗ Gravitation also will, doubtless, in time be shown to be no exception. Faraday observes, “that there should be a power of gravitation existing by itself, having no relation to the other natural powers, and no respect to the law of conservation of force, is as little likely as that there should be a principle of levity as well as of gravity.”—On the Conservation of Forces. Google Scholar

† Edinburgh Review, July, 1858. Google Scholar

‡ “System of Logic.”—J. S. Mill, vol. i., p. 477 Google Scholar

∗ Philosophical Transactions, 1830. Dr. Carpenter “on the Mutual Relations of the Vital and Physical Forces.” Google Scholar

∗ “Elements of Psychology.” Google Scholar

∗ “Similar views respecting the essential homogenity of mind and nature were entertained by Liebnitz in his Monadology; and afterwards illustrated in a series of letters published amongst his Opuscula. Modern science and philosophy, instead of refuting these speculations of, perhaps, the greatest of modern thinkers, has only availed more and more to prove their fundamental consistency, with the principles both of thought and existence. Whatever research, either on the physical or mental side, has proceeded far enough to open the question at all, it has almost uniformly shown a manifest tendency either to recur to the point where Liebnitz left it 200 years ago; or to restate the theory in a more perfect form. Among modern writers we may mention Alex. Von Humboldt, Waltz, Carus, Oersted, Erdmann, Karl Schmidt, &c., as having given clear illustrations of the unity of idea which reigns through the world of mind and nature.”—Note in Morell's “Elements of Psychology,” p. 46. Google Scholar

∗ “Soul in Nature,” p. 53. Google Scholar

† “Lectures on Man.” Google Scholar

∗ Morell's “Elements of Psychology,” p. 83. Google Scholar

∗ Carlyle's Miscellanies, vol. iii. “Goethe's Works.” Google Scholar