Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-94d59 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-27T19:35:32.725Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Psychobiological Constitution of the Weak-Minded

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 February 2018

E. B. Strauss*
Affiliation:
University Psychiatric and Neurological Hospital

Extract

In recent years the approach to psychiatry has become more and more biological. The point of interest is shifting from the kind of mental illness which a person has, to the kind of person who has the illness. The greatest stimulus in this direction to psychiatry in the last few years was undoubtedly the publication, in the year 1921, of Kretschmer's Körperbau und Charakter. Indeed, the stimulus was so violent that nowadays hardly any psychiatric field (not to mention other branches of the biological sciences) has escaped exploration along Kretschmer's lines; and the vast bibliography which has piled up is enough to appal the student of constitutional biology and kindred subjects. For some reason, surprisingly little work has been done on the constitution and temperament of the weak-minded. The object of this present research is to fill the lacuna in some small measure. The neglect of this field of study is surprising, for the reason that weak-mindedness is classified by Kraepelin, the father of modern psychiatry (Psychiatrische Klinik, Barth, Leipzig, 1921, Bd. i, S. 23), in the group of the congenital mental disorders; and a congenital anomaly should surely be expected to provide interesting material for biological research. The present writer, then, approached his subject without prejudice and without a thesis. It was his business to study a group of congenitally weak-minded people, and observe and record their physical and temperamental anomalies.

Type
Part I.—Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1930 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Dearborn, W. F., “Formen des Infantilismus mit Berücksichtigung ihrer klinischen Unterscheidung,” Zeitschr. f. d. Erforsch. und Behandl. jugendl. Schwach., Bd. vi. Heft 5 and 6.Google Scholar
Eisenberg, W., “Endokrine Störungen bei Schwachsinnigen,” Zeitschr. f. Kinderforsch., Bd. xxxv, Heft 2, 1929.Google Scholar
Hirsch, P., Die Abderhalden-Reaktion mittels der quantitiven “interferometrischen” Methode nach P. Hirsch, Jena, Berlin, 1925.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kretschmer, E., Körperbau und Charakter, 8th edition, Springer, Berlin, 1929; Medizinische Psychologie, 3rd edition, Thieme, Leipzig, 1926.Google Scholar
Lokay, A., “Ueber die Hereditären Beziehungen der Imbezillität,” Zeitschr. f. d. ges. Neur. u. Psychiat., 1929.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myerson, , The Inheritance of Mental Diseases, Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, 1925.Google Scholar
Heard, G., The Ascent of Humanity, Jonathan Cape, London, 1929.Google Scholar
Birnbaum, K., Psychosen mit Wahnbildung und wahnhafte Einbildungen bei Degenerativen, Marhold, Halle a. S., 1908.Google Scholar
Scheidt, W., “Somatoscopische und somatometrische Untersuchungen an Knaben des Pubeszenzalters,” Zeitschr. f. Kinderforsch., 1923, Heft 1.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.