Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-r7xzm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-29T14:25:11.639Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Study of the Binet and Cattell Systems of Intelligence Testing in a Colony for Mental Defectives

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2018

J. C. Rohan*
Affiliation:
Coleshill Hall Colony for Mental Defectives, City of Birmingham

Extract

In the estimation of intellectual level the adherents of the Binet-Simon scales still claim for it a predominant position (1). This type of code is empirically constructed, and relies on obtaining small samples of cognitive behaviour of widely different kinds (2). There is, however, another system of testing, diametrically opposed in principle to the Binet plan. This, which is sometimes styled the factorial principle, acknowledges its theoretical dependence on the well-known conceptions on Intelligence of Prof. Spearman (3). The factorial tests are specifically designed to measure the statistically determined “general factor” only. Both methods have their advocates and the theoretical advantages and disadvantages have been hotly debated. The theoretical aspect is not of concern in the present study however. This was undertaken to discover whether the Cattell series of scales—perhaps the most important factorial test series (4)—could be used with advantage to replace or supplement the Binet scales, e.g. the widely used Terman-Merrill Revision—in the clinical examination of adult defectives, who are mainly of high grade. The scales have been compared, in other words, from the point of view of clinical practice, rather than of scientific theory.

Type
Part I.—Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1941 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Termas, L. M., and Merrill, M. A., Measuring Intelligence, Preface and Chapter I.Google Scholar
2 Terman, L. M., The Measurement of intelligence. Google Scholar
3 Freeman, Frank N., Mental Tests, Chapter XVI.Google Scholar
4 Cattell, R. B., Handbook for Scales I, II, III. Google Scholar
5 Spearman, C., A Measure of Intelligence for Use in Schools. Google Scholar
6 Cattell, R. B., Guide to Mental Testing. Google Scholar
7 Ballard, P. B., Mental Tests, Chapter III.Google Scholar
8 Kent, G. H., Suggestions for the Next Revision of the Binet-Simon Scale. Google Scholar
9 Earl, C. J. C., Verbal and Non-Verbal Abilities in Moron Adults. Google Scholar
10 Cattell, R. B., Handbook for Individual Scale O. Google Scholar
11 Earl, C. J. C., A Psychograph for Morons. Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.