Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-fqc5m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-29T15:21:02.112Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On the Predictability of Suicide

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2018

F. Reitman*
Affiliation:
The Lady Chichester Hospital, Hove

Extract

The evaluation of suicide varies with the number of specified aspects employed. Yet none of them is able to offer a predictability of the suicide. Psychiatry acknowledges the fact that suicide is a non-specific symptom, accompanying certain mental disorders, and consequently uses precaution without selective prediction. Psychopathology looks upon the suicidal individual as one who identifies himself with his love object and directs reproaches and aggression against the introjected love object; in the suicidal act he kills the introjected person (Schilder). This only gives the structure analysis of the individual case, and the prediction “the greater the aggression the greater the danger of suicide” does not enable a generalized predictability. Sociological studies offered explanation for statistical coincidences (Durkheim) but failed in construction of a prediction.

Type
Part II.—Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1942 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Durkheim, E. (1897), Le Suicide, Paris.Google Scholar
Jameison, G. (1936), Arch. of Neur. Psych., 36, 111.Google Scholar
Nakamura, R. (1940), Psych. Neur. Japan. 44, 33–8.Google Scholar
Palmer, D. (1941), Journ. Nerv. Ment. Dis., 4.Google Scholar
Reed, C. S. (1936), Brit. Med. Journ., 3926, 631–5.Google Scholar
Schilder, P. (1938), Psychotherapy, Kegan, London.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.