Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-20T00:05:03.522Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Twentieth Maudsley Lecture: Intelligence as a Social Problem

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2018

F. C. Bartlett
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In 1895, as many people here are likely to know, Henry Maudsley combined two of his earlier books into his famous Pathology of Mind. Very near the beginning of this volume, he laid unusual emphasis upon the paramount importance of a study of social conditions in relation to human conduct in general and the varied forms of mental illness in particular. “The study of the individual as an element of social pathology,” he declared, “will plainly be a long, laborious, and difficult business of the future.” He was right. Fifty years have gone and, in spite of many notable contributions, it is a study still in its infancy.

Type
Part I.—Original Articles
Information
Journal of Mental Science , Volume 93 , Issue 390 , January 1947 , pp. 1 - 8
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1947 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

(1) Thurstone, L. L. (1946), “Theories of Intelligence,” Sci. Mon., N.Y., 62, 101–12.Google Scholar
(2) Bartlett, F. C., “The Relation of Thresholds of Sensory Acuity to Perceptual Efficiency,” Flying Personnel Research Committee Report, 636. The experiments were designed and conducted by Grindley, G. C. and Pirenne, M. H. Google Scholar
(3) Vernon, M.D., “The Assessment of Perceptual Ability, and Further Experiments on the Assessment of Perceptual Ability.” Medical Research Council, Cambridge. Unit of Applied Psychology. Reports 29 and 32.Google Scholar
Idem , “Scale and Dial Reading.” Medical Research Council, Cambridge. Unit of Applied Psychology. Report 49.Google Scholar
(4) The references are to so far unpublished work of the Cambridge Psychological Laboratory.Google Scholar
(5) Himmelweit, H. T., and Whitfield, J. W., “Mean Intelligence Scores of a Random Sample of Occupations,” Brit. Journ. Indust. Med., 1, 4, 224–6.Google Scholar
(6) Heim, A. W., “A High Grade Intelligence Test,” Brit. Journ. Psychol., 37, 2.Google Scholar
(7) See, e.g., Leybourne-White, G., Report on Capacity and Opportunity for University Education. University of Manchester.Google Scholar
Finch, F. H., “Enrolment Increases and Changes in the Mental Level,” App. Psych. Monog. of Amer. Psych. Ass., No. 10.Google Scholar
(8) Farmer, E., University Education and Business. Report of a Committee appointed by the University Appointments Board, together with a summary and analysis of evidence collected for the Committee. Cambridge University Press, 1945.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.