Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-tj2md Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T10:30:52.363Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Comparative Study of the Causation of Mongolism, Peristatic Amentia, and Other Types of Mental Defect

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2018

M. Engler
M. Engler*
Affiliation:
St. Lawrence's Hospital, Caterham, Surrey
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Mental deficiency has been defined by Tredgold as a state of arrested or incomplete development of the mind. Numerous scientists have for long endeavoured to ascertain the cause or causes of this frequent abnormality. The protagonists of one school of thought made exaggerated claims that the great majority, if not all cases, were due to hereditary factors. Other investigators were able to demonstrate that certain special types of mental defectives owed their deficiency to agents acting after fertilization, and so came to the conclusion that genetic elements were only concomitant and not primary causative factors in many, if not in all types of defectives, and that research on these lines should eventually establish extrinsic causation in all these cases.

Thus one has gradually come to distinguish between two main groups of mentally abnormal individuals; those in whom endogenous or hereditary factors could be proved or at least suspected. (Tredgold speaks of primary aments, Strauss of endogenous types, and those in whom exogenous noxious influences could be demonstrated or suspected, and whom Tredgold termed secondary aments, Strauss calls exogenous types.) According to Tredgold and many other investigators, from between 70 to 80 per cent. of all defectives are to be found in the first group, while roughly 20 to 30 per cent. belong to the second. Penrose's figures in support of a hereditary causation are even higher.

Type
Part I.—Original Articles
Information
Journal of Mental Science , Volume 98 , Issue 411 , April 1952 , pp. 316 - 325
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1952 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Benda, C. E., “Endocrine Aspects of Mongolism,” J. Clin. Endocrinol., 1942, 2, No. 12, 737–748.Google Scholar
Idem, Mongolism and Cretinism, 1946. New York: Grune & Strutton.Google Scholar
Carruthers, , Med. J. Aust., 1945, 1, 315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davenport, C. B., The Origin and Control of Mental Defectiveness, 1912.Google Scholar
Desclaux, P., “Idiotie mongolienne chez une eurasienne. R⊚le possible d'une intoxication par la quinine pendant la gestation,” Arch. Franç. de Pédiatrie, 1951, 8, 167–170.Google Scholar
Down, , Langdon, J., “Observations on an Ethnic Classification of Idiots,” London Hosp. Rep., 1866, 3, 259–262.Google Scholar
Doxiades, L., and Portius, W., “Zur Aetiologie des Mongolismus unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Sippenbefunde,” Z. menschl. Konstitutionslehre, 1937–38, 21, 384–446.Google Scholar
Engler, M., “Causation of Mongolism,” J. Neurol., Neurosurg., Psychiat., 1944, 7, Nos. 1 and 2, January and April, 27–29.Google Scholar
Idem, “The Causation of Mongolism and its Prognosis,” Proc. Roy. Soc. Med., Sect. Psychiat., 1945, 38, No. 5, March, 211–216, abridged; also Amer. J. Ment. Def., 1945, 50, No. 1, July, 27–34.Google Scholar
Idem, Mongolism—Peristatic Amentia, 1949. Bristol: John Wright & Sons, Ltd.Google Scholar
Evans, , Med. J. Aust., 1944, 2, 225.Google Scholar
Geyer, , Horst, , Zur Aetiologie der Monogloiden Idiotie, 1939. Leipzig: Georg Thieme Verlag.Google Scholar
Gregg, N. McA., Trans. Ophthal. Soc. Aust., 1941, 3, 35.Google Scholar
Gunther, M., and Penrose, L. S., “The Genetics of Epiloia,” J. Genet., 1935.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hermann, , Charles, , “The Etiology of Mongolian Imbecility,” Arch. Ped., 1917, 34, 494–503.Google Scholar
Idem, “Mongolian Imbecility as an Anthropologic Problem,” ibid., 1925, 42, 523–529.Google Scholar
Hill, , Bertram, , “Mongolism and its Pathology : An Analysis of Eight Cases,” Quart, J. Med., 1908–09, 2, 49–68.Google Scholar
Ingalls, T. H., Pediat., 1948, 1, 315.Google Scholar
Idem and Davies, J. A. V., “Mongolism following Intercurrent Infectious Disease in Pregnancy,” New England J. Med., 1947, 236, 437–438.Google Scholar
Jenkins, R. L., “Etiology of Mongolism,” Amer. J. Dis. Child., 1933, 45, 506–519.Google Scholar
Jervis, G. A., “The Genetics of Phenylpyruvic Oligophrenia,” Proc. Amer. Assoc. Mental Def., 1938–39, 44, No. 2, 13–24.Google Scholar
Kallman, F. J., Barrera, S. E., Hoch, P. H., and Kelley, D. M., “The Role of Mental Deficiency in the Incidence of Schizophrenia,” Amer. J. Ment. Def., 1940–41, 45, 514–539.Google Scholar
Lamm, S., “Asphyxia as a Cause of Mental Deficiency,” ibid., 1943, 48, 131–136.Google Scholar
Landtmann, B., Arch. Dis. Child., 1948, 23, 237.Google Scholar
Levy, S., and Perry, H. A., “The Role of Maternal Illness in the Etiology of Mongolism,” Amer. J. Ment. Def., 1948, 53, 284–293.Google ScholarPubMed
Martin, , Brit. med. J., 1945, i, 855.Google Scholar
Idem, ibid., 1946, i, 588.Google Scholar
Murphy, D. P., Shirlock, M. E., and Doll, E. A., “Microcephaly following Maternal Pelvic Irradiation for the Interruption of Pregnancy,” Amer. J. Roent. and Rod. Ther., 1942, 48, 356–359.Google Scholar
Myers, B., “Male Twins, one of which is a Mongol,” Proc. Roy. Soc. Med., Sect. Child., 1924–25, 18, 69.Google Scholar
Parsons, L. G., Brit. Med. Bull., 1946, 4, 193.Google Scholar
Péhu, M., and Perrin, R., “Sur le mongolisme infantile,” Rev. franç, Pédiat., 13, 1937, 209–211.Google Scholar
Idem and Gaté, J., “Sur le mongolisme infantile,” ibid., 1937, 13, 212–215.Google Scholar
Idem and Brochier, A., “Le problème obstetrical du mongolisme infantile,” Bull. acad. méd., 1936, 116, 42–51.Google Scholar
Penrose, L. S., Lancet, 1935, July 27, 192.Google Scholar
Idem, Colchester “Survey : A Clinical and Genetic Study of 1,280 Cases of Mental Defect,” Sp. Rep. Ser. Med. Res. Coun., 1938, No. 229. H.M.S.O.Google Scholar
Idem, The Biology of Mental Defect, 1949. London.Google Scholar
Idem, “Heredity and Environment in the Causation of Foetal Malformation,” Practitioner, 1951, 155, 429–435.Google Scholar
Reese, A. B., Amer. J. Ophth., 1944, 28, 186.Google Scholar
Idem, ibid., 1948, 31, 95.Google Scholar
Sarason, Seymour B., Psychological Problems in Mental Deficiency, 1949. New York: Harper & Brothers.Google Scholar
van derScheer, W. M., “Beiträge zur Kenntnis der mongoloiden Missbildung,” Abh. aus der Neur., Psychiat., Psychol. und ihren Grenz., 1927, 41. Berlin: S. Karger.Google Scholar
Schreiber, F., “Mental Deficiency from Paranatal Asphyxia,” Proc. Amer. Ass. Ment. Def., 1939, 44, No. 1, 95–106.Google Scholar
Simpson, , Hope, , Lancet, 1944, i, 483.Google Scholar
Stewart, R. M., “Observations on the Pathology of Cerebral Diplegia,” Proc. Roy. Soc. Med., 1942, 36, 25–32.Google Scholar
Still, C. F., “Place in Family as a Factor in Disease,” Lancet, 1927, ii, 795–800, 853–858.Google Scholar
Swan, C., Med. J. Aust., 1943, ii, 201.Google Scholar
Idem, ibid., 1944, i, 409.Google Scholar
Tobler, W., “Zur Aetiologie der mongoloiden Idiotie,” Mschr. Kinderheilk., 1938, 76, 62–71.Google Scholar
Tredgold, A. F., Mental Deficiency, 1947. London.Google Scholar
Warkany, J., “Some Factors in the Etiology of Congenital Malformations,” Amer. J. Ment. Def., 1945, 50, 231–241.Google Scholar
Idem, Advances in Pediatrics, 1947, 2, 1. New York: Interscience Publishers.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.