Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T14:24:01.347Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Effects of Temporal Lobe Lesions on Behaviour in Paranoid States

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2018

A. J. Oldham
A. J. Oldham*
Affiliation:
Cane Hill Hospital, Coulsdon, Surrey; lately Senior Registrar to the Professorial Unit, The Bethlem Royal Hospital and the Maudsley Hospital
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The effects of temporal lobe lesions on behaviour have recently received considerable attention. There is reason to believe that certain types of abnormal behaviour are related to neurophysiological disturbances localized in the temporal lobes (Hill and Watterson, 1942; Rey, Pond and Evans, 1949). The effects of excisions of the temporal lobes on behaviour have been studied in animals (Klüver and Bucy, 1938), and in human subjects (Penfield and Flanigan, 1950; Bailey and Gibbs, 1951), while those of therapeutic incisions have been described by Obrador (1947). They appear to have certain features in common with those resulting from lesions of the frontal lobes. However, knowledge in this field is still in its infancy, and the following two cases in which temporal lobe lesions supervened upon paranoid states are therefore considered as worthy of interest. They were observed at the Professorial Unit of the Bethlem Royal and Maudsley Hospitals.

Type
Part I.—Original Articles
Information
Journal of Mental Science , Volume 99 , Issue 416 , July 1953 , pp. 580 - 587
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1953 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bailey, P., and Gibbs, F., J. Am. Med. Assoc., 1951, 145, 365.Google Scholar
Brickner, F. M., Arch. Neurol. Psychiat., 1935, 33, 805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burckhardt, G., Allgem. Zeitsch. Psychiat., 1891, 47, 463.Google Scholar
Fox, J., and German, W., Arch. Neurol. Psychiat., 1935, 33, 791.Google Scholar
Hill, D., Proc. Roy. Soc. Med., 1944, 37, 317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Idem and Watterson, D., J. Neurol. Psychiat., 1942, 5, 47.Google Scholar
Jackson, Hughlings, Selected Writings, 1931, vol. i. London.Google Scholar
Kleist, K., “Hirnpathologie,” 1934, i, 550.Google Scholar
Idem, Zentralbl. ges. Neurol. u. Psychiat., 1923, 33, 82.Google Scholar
Klüver, H., and Bucy, P. C., J. Psychol., 1938, 5, 33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iidem, Arch. Neurol. Psychiat., 1939, 42, 979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iidem, ibid, 1940, 44, 1142.Google Scholar
Obrador, J., J. Neuropath. and Exp. Neurol., 1947, 6, 185.Google Scholar
Papez, J. W., Arch. Neurol. and Psychiat., 1937, 38, 725.Google Scholar
Penfield, W., and Flanigan, H., Arch. Neurol. Psychiat., 1950, 64, 491.Google Scholar
Rey, J., Pond, D., and Evans, C., Proc. Roy. Soc. Med., 1949, 42, 891.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, C., Zeitsch. ges. Neur. Psychiat., 1925a, 96, 251.Google Scholar
Idem, ibid., 1925b, 96, 572.Google Scholar
Thiele, W., in Bumke's Handb. d. Geisteskrankh., 1928, vol. ii.Google Scholar
Yahn, M., Pimanta, M., and Sette, A., Proc. 1st Internat. Congress Psychosurg., 1949, 107.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.